Old Time's Sake..
i know i've screwed up
and still currently doing so.
relationships
min
and even sch work
and the thought of a particular someone i have to face tmr in the first period gave rose to one of my archived entries. it would be entirely applicable if put in the reverse order.
The Most Favoured Nation's Clause.
Haha, no. i'm not going to talk about China.
The Most Favoured Nations Clause usually results in economic benefits due to political ties or vice versa.
Cant remember and cant really be bothered to find out. too tired. tmr.
i was just thinking about one of our friendlies. man, that 1st opp made credible amount of sense and despite eventually being tackled, it was the style she possesed that endured in my mind till now.
not her natural style, but the tone in her voice that said she truly and wholeheartedly was convicted of what she was proving.
i recall vaguely having that at some time in sec3. i think it was the mandatory voting motion.
somehow, many have lost it.
'it's more professional now'. sadly to the point that the 'passion' in the speech is gone. the 'power', the 'essence'. it's been somewhat supressed.
we were warned of it.
it was foretold.
well, can we reverse what has been done?
i think so. - evil grin-
anywz, i'm not making much sense and will probably, due to the slip of the finger, convey something here that would never have passed the censor boards.
anywz, backtrack to the thesis, the Most Favoured Nation Clause.
actually, i was just thinking of favouritism.
not exactly, but preference of people in general.
i used to entertain this kind of thinking -
guys are the isolationists.
girls are the ones in everybody's clique.
the trend shows-
in a game of basketball
the point guard gets injured
whistle blows
the reserve takes his place.
in netball
player gets wounded
no whistle blows
and the whole team gathers round that particular player.
some with tears, may i add.
than again, thats not the full truth.
the little piece of paper i picked up during my filing (which i mentioned 2 days back) concerned this topic.
that write up was based on another trend.
not say entirely dominant
but noticable enough to get on one's nerves.
here's how it started.
i just noticed that i dont seem to interest guys as much as girls (yes, i'm staright, i appreciate your concern. i'm talking about the buddy level here). also, i found that i lose much of my guy audience to some sister talking about something else.
say a guy fancies a girl.
the girls a dancer.
the guy naturally would be fully willing listen to the dramas in the ballet room though before he even met her, he knew nuts about dance.
than some people question, which comes first - the similarity, or the liking.
maybe that guy was a choreographer, thats why he even took notice of her in the first place.
or, if the guy werent a dancer, he might not have shown the same feelings towards her.
i highly doubt the similarity has to come first. afterall, there will always be differences that account for listening to.
so, what am i getting at?
basically, if i can capture a sisters attention better than a brother, also noting that most of the time, i'd typically lose a guy's attention to some sister, it shows that guys are just more interested in what the girl has to say more than the guy. just because she's a girl.
BUT, most sisters are cool with each other. not dao like us guys. so sisters prefer their own kind more, or at least for bossom friend senarios (you can have plenty of close friends but only one stead), where does that leave guys? in the lurch.
guys are isolationists. this means, when it comes to sharing secrets, its secrete. they'll share it with one or two people, and keep it there. girls will share it among they're network of pals, and chances are, it turns into gossip.
when a guy choses his close friend to share his 'secret' with, he choses a - bingo, you got it- a girl. so the girl gets compelled to be a friend (hypothetically) and also begins to share her secrets whom she has already shared to other close friends. the guy in turn feels exclusive not knowing that he isnt the only one who, she has shared to. and guys think thats friendship. thats who're they're close to.
disgusting.
it feels so victimized to be male. (yes, i'm straight, i needn say again). how izzit that we push each other off at the mercy of another kind.
favourtism. in some sense.
anywz, its really late and maybe thats why i'm just sparking out notions here and there whenever it comes to mind.
no logical fluency nor coherency. i'll re-edit this some time more sane.
enough said tonight.
the lonesome creature
masks all within.
and still currently doing so.
relationships
min
and even sch work
and the thought of a particular someone i have to face tmr in the first period gave rose to one of my archived entries. it would be entirely applicable if put in the reverse order.
The Most Favoured Nation's Clause.
Haha, no. i'm not going to talk about China.
The Most Favoured Nations Clause usually results in economic benefits due to political ties or vice versa.
Cant remember and cant really be bothered to find out. too tired. tmr.
i was just thinking about one of our friendlies. man, that 1st opp made credible amount of sense and despite eventually being tackled, it was the style she possesed that endured in my mind till now.
not her natural style, but the tone in her voice that said she truly and wholeheartedly was convicted of what she was proving.
i recall vaguely having that at some time in sec3. i think it was the mandatory voting motion.
somehow, many have lost it.
'it's more professional now'. sadly to the point that the 'passion' in the speech is gone. the 'power', the 'essence'. it's been somewhat supressed.
we were warned of it.
it was foretold.
well, can we reverse what has been done?
i think so. - evil grin-
anywz, i'm not making much sense and will probably, due to the slip of the finger, convey something here that would never have passed the censor boards.
anywz, backtrack to the thesis, the Most Favoured Nation Clause.
actually, i was just thinking of favouritism.
not exactly, but preference of people in general.
i used to entertain this kind of thinking -
guys are the isolationists.
girls are the ones in everybody's clique.
the trend shows-
in a game of basketball
the point guard gets injured
whistle blows
the reserve takes his place.
in netball
player gets wounded
no whistle blows
and the whole team gathers round that particular player.
some with tears, may i add.
than again, thats not the full truth.
the little piece of paper i picked up during my filing (which i mentioned 2 days back) concerned this topic.
that write up was based on another trend.
not say entirely dominant
but noticable enough to get on one's nerves.
here's how it started.
i just noticed that i dont seem to interest guys as much as girls (yes, i'm staright, i appreciate your concern. i'm talking about the buddy level here). also, i found that i lose much of my guy audience to some sister talking about something else.
say a guy fancies a girl.
the girls a dancer.
the guy naturally would be fully willing listen to the dramas in the ballet room though before he even met her, he knew nuts about dance.
than some people question, which comes first - the similarity, or the liking.
maybe that guy was a choreographer, thats why he even took notice of her in the first place.
or, if the guy werent a dancer, he might not have shown the same feelings towards her.
i highly doubt the similarity has to come first. afterall, there will always be differences that account for listening to.
so, what am i getting at?
basically, if i can capture a sisters attention better than a brother, also noting that most of the time, i'd typically lose a guy's attention to some sister, it shows that guys are just more interested in what the girl has to say more than the guy. just because she's a girl.
BUT, most sisters are cool with each other. not dao like us guys. so sisters prefer their own kind more, or at least for bossom friend senarios (you can have plenty of close friends but only one stead), where does that leave guys? in the lurch.
guys are isolationists. this means, when it comes to sharing secrets, its secrete. they'll share it with one or two people, and keep it there. girls will share it among they're network of pals, and chances are, it turns into gossip.
when a guy choses his close friend to share his 'secret' with, he choses a - bingo, you got it- a girl. so the girl gets compelled to be a friend (hypothetically) and also begins to share her secrets whom she has already shared to other close friends. the guy in turn feels exclusive not knowing that he isnt the only one who, she has shared to. and guys think thats friendship. thats who're they're close to.
disgusting.
it feels so victimized to be male. (yes, i'm straight, i needn say again). how izzit that we push each other off at the mercy of another kind.
favourtism. in some sense.
anywz, its really late and maybe thats why i'm just sparking out notions here and there whenever it comes to mind.
no logical fluency nor coherency. i'll re-edit this some time more sane.
enough said tonight.
the lonesome creature
masks all within.