Extracted.
Based on balance, our instince is steared towards change rather than continuity: Mr Kerry, not Mr Bush.
Whenever we express a view of that sort, some readers are bound to protest that we, as a publication based in London, should nopt be poking our noses in other people's polititcs. Translated, this invariably means that protesters disagree with our choice. It may also, however, reflect a lack of awareness about our readership. The Economist's weekly sales in the United States are about 450 000 copies, which is three times our British sale and roughly 45% of our worldwide total. All those American readers will now be pondering how to vote, or indeed whether to, Thus, as at every presidential election since 1980, we hope it may be useful for us to say how we would think about our vote - if we had one.
wow. 1980 means when Ronald Reagan kicked Jimmy Carter out. and George Bush Senior was with RR.
also, man, economist sure is B***y. but the word describes this portion in entirety.
i thought george bush was getting an edge in Yougov polls although most ppl thought he forfeited all 3 debates. contrary to common belief, i think Kerry's not inconsistant. he just changes according to the winds of time. but his protectionism policy is a boo boo. but it apeals to americans. so, its not surprising that we gets the inaugaration.
enough about this crap. i'll be writting furiously away on the day the election results are announced.
and i must get back to work.
i have been living life talking about the various stuff we could do after O's. unproductive, but fulfilling. and now i got to make up for wasted time.
think i'll go kap and revive certain old memories held there.
emath papers, rv, venice, swiss, merger, welfare state, population and write an essay on Eheng's given topics. that should be feasible. and now -
shoo,
off to work.
Based on balance, our instince is steared towards change rather than continuity: Mr Kerry, not Mr Bush.
Whenever we express a view of that sort, some readers are bound to protest that we, as a publication based in London, should nopt be poking our noses in other people's polititcs. Translated, this invariably means that protesters disagree with our choice. It may also, however, reflect a lack of awareness about our readership. The Economist's weekly sales in the United States are about 450 000 copies, which is three times our British sale and roughly 45% of our worldwide total. All those American readers will now be pondering how to vote, or indeed whether to, Thus, as at every presidential election since 1980, we hope it may be useful for us to say how we would think about our vote - if we had one.
wow. 1980 means when Ronald Reagan kicked Jimmy Carter out. and George Bush Senior was with RR.
also, man, economist sure is B***y. but the word describes this portion in entirety.
i thought george bush was getting an edge in Yougov polls although most ppl thought he forfeited all 3 debates. contrary to common belief, i think Kerry's not inconsistant. he just changes according to the winds of time. but his protectionism policy is a boo boo. but it apeals to americans. so, its not surprising that we gets the inaugaration.
-
enough about this crap. i'll be writting furiously away on the day the election results are announced.
and i must get back to work.
i have been living life talking about the various stuff we could do after O's. unproductive, but fulfilling. and now i got to make up for wasted time.
think i'll go kap and revive certain old memories held there.
emath papers, rv, venice, swiss, merger, welfare state, population and write an essay on Eheng's given topics. that should be feasible. and now -
shoo,
off to work.